----Security_Multipart(Wed_Nov_24_20_41_03_2004_380)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"Mike M. Volokhov" <mishka@apk.od.ua> wrote
  in <20041124130003.0d24da37.mishka@apk.od.ua>:

mishka> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:29:04 +0900 (JST)
mishka> Hiroki Sato <hrs@NetBSD.org> wrote:
mishka> >  No, this breaks outputs other than HTML.
mishka> 
mishka> That's may be easy fixed.

 I do not think so.  If we do not use <citerefentry>, standard utilities for
 DocBook which are used to generate an index do not work, for example.

 Hmmm, I do not want to say that your idea is bad, but original vocabulary
 is harmful in many cases.  I think <pkg>, <ports>, and <gnutspr> are
 no exception.  They can be <filename role="pkg">, <ulink role="ports">,
 and <ulink role="gnutspr"> respectively and the latter are more reasonable
 from the XML's perspective...

 Does anyone have any objections about replacing our original tags with
 the equivalent ones in the DocBook standard?  If there is no specific
 reason to stick to them, I would like to replace and clean up them.
 The tag will be slightly longer than the current one, but I believe
 the current way has few advantages and many disadvantages.

-- 
| Hiroki SATO

----Security_Multipart(Wed_Nov_24_20_41_03_2004_380)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBBpHNTTyzT2CeTzy0RAkY2AKC9KLHAFwiAsuGI6+9lpZuM5YYHSwCgw2/P
EfXlNSLvHy5sobiCXAd83tE=
=cDSb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

----Security_Multipart(Wed_Nov_24_20_41_03_2004_380)----