On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:29:04 +0900 (JST)
Hiroki Sato <hrs@NetBSD.org> wrote:

> "Mike M. Volokhov" <mishka@apk.od.ua> wrote
>   in <20041124095242.74343b12.mishka@apk.od.ua>:
> 
> mishka> Seems we use &man.foo.X; entities so as it much shorten than original
> mishka> DocBook references. However, why not define our own tag, say <nbman/>,
> mishka> for NetBSD man pages, just like it done for a <pkg/>. For example:
> 
>  No, this breaks outputs other than HTML.

That's may be easy fixed.

>  We should not use original
>  vocabulary as much as we can if the new element does not represent
>  the *new* logical meaning.

Heh, there is a reason.

But now how, for example, about <gnatspr/> and <port/> ?

The first is just like proposed <nbman/> and the second one may be
safely avoided just as &man.foo.X; (even much more safer, so as port
list is more static). I see no logic.

--
Mishka.