re: alacritty: possible inputmethod issue?

[matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>]

> > while Martin preferred b), i'd rather go with a) so we match
> > upstream's implementation.
>
> FreeBSD 13, OpenBSD 6.9 & Ubuntu 19.04, all three, also take
> option a).

actually, upstream have it as a ./configure switch, but it's good
to see that others don't use it.

i ran a quick test to comapre the resource consumption for these
and i'm convinced that the dynamic version wastes more memory in
all cases.  on amd64 if the 5 libraries are dynamically loaded
then 20 or 21 more machine pages will be allocated.

also makes alacritty work.  :-)  i'll commit something soon.

thanks again RVP!


.mrg.