Re: Built-in vs. Modular Xorg under -current

[Chavdar Ivanov <ci4ic4%gmail.com@localhost>]

The patch applied cleanly and the subsequent build finished. However,
the resulting Xorg does not even load GLX now:
...
[   412.701] (II) Loading /usr/X11R7/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so
[   412.716] (EE) Failed to load
/usr/X11R7/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so:
/usr/X11R7/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so: Undefined symbol
"glXGetProcAddressARB" (symnum = 492)
....

Maybe I was wrong to build this with '-u', I might try a full build later.

On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 22:00, Chavdar Ivanov <ci4ic4%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>
> Thanks, I'll check it out right away.
>
> Chavdar
>
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 21:21, matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there anything I might be missing or our built-in Xorg is lacking
> > > for this hardware?
> >
> > this may be old Mesa on your intel GPU not supporting that.
> >
> > we're very close to switching xsrc to Mesa 18 for all ports.
> > it works on non x86, and this patch below is needed for x86.
> >
> >    https://www.netbsd.org/~mrg/mesa18.src.working.v2.diffs
> >
> > you'll need to build with -V HAVE_MESA_VER=18, and it will
> > build llvm tools *and* libs and thus take a significantly
> > longer time to build, but this works for me on kaby lake
> > intel, bunch of radeon generations, and some nouveau ones.
> >
> >
> > .mrg.
>
>
>
> --
> ----



-- 
----