On 20.01.2019 11:03, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 10:32:43AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> I find it as workaround of our libc behavior. > > I disagree, there is no clean way to implement the call-on-dlclose > semantics (i.e. it needs disgusting ld.elf_so hacks and layer violations). > > But maybe we should document the __cxa_atexit interface or provide a > public version? > libc++abi does not support a public interface to __cxa_atexit. It's also documented as being an internal API, so in my opinion without need for a documentation. It could be mentioned in atexit(3). > Martin > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature