Re: xvfb not built on vax and x68k?

[Patrick Finnegan <pat%computer-refuge.org@localhost>]

On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Brad Parker wrote:
> David Brownlee wrote:
> >     any
> >     objections to making those two ports consistent with all
> >     the others so all NetBSD ports build the Xvfb virtual
> >     framebuffer X server?
>
> If it balloons out the build times I'd prefer not, at least on the
> vax port.  None of the vaxen I use have frame buffers.

Well, I think the point of xvfb is that it doesn't require or use a 
framebuffer in the machine.

Pat
-- 
Purdue University Research Computing ---  http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge                  ---  http://computer-refuge.org