On Thu 09 Dec 2021 at 19:33:52 +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > The most likely route forward would be for shells to implement some new > builtin command, similar to trap, but with some of the current weirdness, > including this, fixed. But to do that, how the new method interacts > with the old would need to be sorted out. Or some other "prefix" command, which un-ignores signals and then exec()s its arguments. (like nohup, but in reverse...) Obviously, with these rules for shells, it cannot be implemented as a shell script... > kre -Olaf. -- ___ "Buying carbon credits is a bit like a serial killer paying someone else to \X/ have kids to make his activity cost neutral." -The BOFH falu.nl@rhialto
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature