tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Adding <alloca.h> ?

To: Jaromír Dole?ek <jaromir.dolecek%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Adding <alloca.h> ?
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:58:18 +0200

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:51:45PM +0200, Jaromír Dole?ek wrote:
> On the contrary, Linux <alloca.h> explicitely #undefs alloca(), then
> #define alloca() as __builtin_alloca(), so it always works, regardless
> which -std.

But isn't that obviously wrong and our version the correct one?
(Well, maybe we should never provide anything if there is no __builtin_alloca())

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Adding <alloca.h> ?
  - From: Jaromír Doleček

References:
- Adding <alloca.h> ?
  - From: Jaromír Doleček
- Re: Adding <alloca.h> ?
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Adding <alloca.h> ?
  - From: Jaromír Doleček
- Re: Adding <alloca.h> ?
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Adding <alloca.h> ?
  - From: Jaromír Doleček

Prev by Date: Re: Adding <alloca.h> ?
Next by Date: Re: Adding <alloca.h> ?
Previous by Thread: Re: Adding <alloca.h> ?
Next by Thread: Re: Adding <alloca.h> ?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index