At Fri, 12 Mar 2021 21:46:29 -0500 (EST), Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost> wrote: Subject: Re: odd ATF failure for sh: ulimit_redirection_interaction failed > > > But it still doesn't really make sense from what I see in the source. > > The attempted FD is #18, but the error just says "1", not "18": > > Does >&N _ever_ work for multi-digit N? I thought it didn't. Maybe > that was just least-common-denominator sh, or maybe the test is broken? Well, the test does appear to execute without error IFF the condition the test is meant to exercise is not enforced (i.e. if the ulimit for open FDs is not kept lower than the number of currently open FDs); though I have not done any other kind of test to be sure the data sent to a multi-digit FD is actually received from the given FD. -- Greg A. Woods <gwoods%acm.org@localhost> Kelowna, BC +1 250 762-7675 RoboHack <woods%robohack.ca@localhost> Planix, Inc. <woods%planix.com@localhost> Avoncote Farms <woods%avoncote.ca@localhost>
Attachment:
pgpSysFCZ_GN4.pgp
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature