tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: PATCH libatomic

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 04:09:02PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> I object to opinions that libatomic is generally broken, if that would
> be the cause, it wouldn't be available and used on relatively all
> relevant generic purpose Operating Systems. Personally, I already
> received last year a feedback from one 3rd party project from Microsoft
> that they prefer to drop NetBSD support (out of Windows, Linux, MacOS,
> BSDs) rather than allow non-libatomic usage.

You need to stop being ambiguous about the rationale, it's not helping
your arguments sound strong. Name the project and link to the

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index