Re: posix_spawnp() and PATH - change code or manual ?

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: posix_spawnp() and PATH - change code or manual ?
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 22:14:42 +0200

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 10:03:54PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
>   | We have a summer of code project that can cover this part.
> 
> Thanks for the info, which project is that, and who is mentoring it,
> if you know?   (I am woefully ignorant of everything related to GSoC).

See https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/projects/#5101731152658432

Joerg

References:
- Re: posix_spawnp() and PATH - change code or manual ?
  - From: Martin Husemann
- posix_spawnp() and PATH - change code or manual ?
  - From: Robert Elz
- Re: posix_spawnp() and PATH - change code or manual ?
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: posix_spawnp() and PATH - change code or manual ?
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: posix_spawnp() and PATH - change code or manual ?
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: posix_spawnp() and PATH - change code or manual ?
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: posix_spawnp() and PATH - change code or manual ?
  - From: Robert Elz

Prev by Date: Re: posix_spawnp() and PATH - change code or manual ?
Next by Date: PATCH libatomic
Previous by Thread: Re: posix_spawnp() and PATH - change code or manual ?
Next by Thread: Re: posix_spawnp() and PATH - change code or manual ?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index