tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: dirname(3) used on its own results?

To: Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>
Subject: Re: dirname(3) used on its own results?
From: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:44:59 +0000

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 03:22:37PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> We are going to need change anyway, as POSIX is changing to require
> thread safe implementations of dirname() (and basename()).

What a pity they do that without introducing basename_r(). 
configure scripts will have to test run-time behavior os basename()
to figure the flavor.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- dirname(3) used on its own results?
  - From: Simon Burge
- Re: dirname(3) used on its own results?
  - From: Robert Elz

Prev by Date: Re: dirname(3) used on its own results?
Next by Date: Re: dirname(3) used on its own results?
Previous by Thread: Re: dirname(3) used on its own results?
Next by Thread: Re: dirname(3) used on its own results?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index