On 01.10.2017 23:04, Robert Elz wrote: > ps: the tac in gnu coreutils is by no means "original" - the tac command > way predates GNU - I forget who created it initially, but the real original > (non GPL'd) version could probably be found if there was a good reason > for that. > I see, so if this is non-GNU case, I have no objections. I was worried about approach of creating yet another gnu/linux on BSD-license, that is by design worse as we don't support the switches of GNU tac(1). Thank you for your explanation.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature