Re: "cno" keyword for config(8)

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 12:29:46AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> 
> But an alternative would be to just change "no" so that it doesn't fail
> when there is nothing to remove (make "no" effectively be "cno") - the
> effect (not having whatever it is) is achieved whether the "no" deletes
> it or whether it never existed in the first place.

I like this better.

-- 
  Thor Lancelot Simon	                                     tls%panix.com@localhost

    "The dirtiest word in art is the C-word.  I can't even say 'craft'
     without feeling dirty."	-Chuck Close