Re: pthread library related

[Charles Cui <charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost>]

Thanks Martin and Soda!
How about other functions? Does it make sense to follow POSIX standard
to implement the missing functions in netbsd?

2016-05-18 19:00 GMT-07:00 SODA Noriyuki <soda%yuruyuru.net@localhost>:

> >>>>> On Thu, 19 May 2016 01:13:09 +0200,
>       Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> said:
>
> > int pthread_barrierattr_setpshared(pthread_barrierattr_t *attr,
> >        int pshared)
> > {
> >       return EINVAL;
> > }
>
> I think the following is better:
>
> int pthread_barrierattr_setpshared(pthread_barrierattr_t *attr,
>         int pshared)
> {
>         switch (pshared) {
>         case PTHREAD_PROCESS_PRIVATE:
>                 return 0;
>         case PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED:
>                 return ENOSYS;
>         }
>         return EINVAL;
> }
> --
> soda
>