[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Adding %m conversion to the printf(3) family
On 2015-10-23 23:28, Mouse wrote:
Subject: Adding %m conversion to the printf(3) family
Didn't we discuss this recently? I have a fuzzy memory we did.
Yes, we did. Though the starting point was rather different, we did
discuss adding %m support to printf. It was just a couple of months
ago, too - starting 2015-08-21. (You even contributed to the
As a quick summary of my stance there, which hasn't changed: I think
that, ideally, %m should go away entirely; if it exists in printf,
there should be a way to get -Wformat warnings as if it didn't
(preferably defaulted on).
Unless someone says something more than a rehash of stuff from August,
I don't expect to say anything further in this thread.
This is more of a follow on rather than a re-hash.
NetBSD's gcc now spits un-solveable warnings in my code which i find
Christos put forth 3 possible solutions to my problem. Here they are:
Then it works... To do this "right" would require:
- an additional annotation (I know what I am doing)
- the ability to convert from syslog to printf (weakens the tests)
- make printf understand %m and forget about syslog format
I chose the last option, which is why I'm talking here.
Main Index |
Thread Index |