Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case

To: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
From: David Laight <david%l8s.co.uk@localhost>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:23:11 +0000

On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 11:47:53AM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> 
> Now, "faster" for a shell is hard to test, though I note that we usually
> do quite well in most tests.

Especially against bash - which is epically slow running scripts.

        David

-- 
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost

References:
- bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: Greg Troxel
- Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: Richard Hansen
- Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: Richard Hansen
- Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: Julio Merino
- Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon

Prev by Date: Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
Next by Date: Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
Previous by Thread: Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
Next by Thread: Re: bug in sh, probably, with test case
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index