Re: fsck SIGINFO

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 11:40:23AM -0500, Ty Sarna wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> 
> > Has fsck recently lost it's ability to respond to SIGINFO, at least in the 
> > early phases?
> 
> I've seen this as well. I think dump also doesn't respond to SIGINFO like it 
> used to.

I have seen siginfo being mapped to ^@ instead of ^t.

Martin