tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 16bit ctype table

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: 16bit ctype table
From: christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:05:59 +0000 (UTC)

In article <20120925133938.GA29951%britannica.bec.de@localhost>,
Joerg Sonnenberger  <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
>> 
>> __BUILDOLDC might be better since __BUILDCOLD parses as __BUILD-COLD
>
>I didn't invent the name, I'm just going with what libc/Makefile already
>uses.

I meant it as a joke (dead and cold), and it was not exposed outside
the Makefile. It is confusing...

christos

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

References:
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Matt Thomas
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: Increasing FreeBSD compatibility in mtree
Next by Date: Re: Increasing FreeBSD compatibility in mtree
Previous by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
Next by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index