tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 16bit ctype table

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: 16bit ctype table
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 02:37:04 +0200

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:35:08AM +0900, Takehiko NOZAKI wrote:
> i have done build test on all tier-1, freebsd, linux..
> 
> nobody have comment, objection to my patch.
> i'll commit my patch this weekend.

I still don't see the point in redefining the ctype stuff. Does it
*really* break on any platform we care about?

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Takehiko NOZAKI

References:
- 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Takehiko NOZAKI
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Takehiko NOZAKI
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Takehiko NOZAKI

Prev by Date: Re: 16bit ctype table
Next by Date: Re: Increasing FreeBSD compatibility in mtree
Previous by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
Next by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index