tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 16bit ctype table

To: joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost
Subject: Re: 16bit ctype table
From: yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 06:56:37 +0000 (UTC)

hi,

> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:02:53AM +0900, Takehiko NOZAKI wrote:
>> we have to go with _CTYPE_* == _RUNETYPE_* ordering from the start.
> 
> Attached version would be doing that. I don't think it is really an
> improvement in this case though.
> 
> Joerg

does it mean it's now almost identical to tnozaki's version?

how do you think about BUILDCOLD/_COMPAT_BSDCTYPE?

YAMAMOTO Takashi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

References:
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: W e b s i t e - T r a f f i c - G e n e r a t o r
Next by Date: Re: 16bit ctype table
Previous by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
Next by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index