12 maj 2011 kl. 21.24 skrev der Mouse: >>> [I]t seems to me this should be part of SCM_CREDS. Surely it >>> wouldn't be that hard to version the structure and option to do >>> that? Or is there some reason _I_'m missing why that would be a Bad >>> Thing? >> What if more than one process has an open fd to the socket? Which >> should it give? > > The one which did the send, of course. > > You have exactly the same issue for the information SCM_CREDS already > carries; a quick look at the code makes me think the issue is resolved > this way already for that data. uid doesn't "exit" and gets replaced by something else. Love in dreams of UUIDs
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature