tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: libquota proposal



On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:21:22PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
 > > That's a bug, or more accurately legacy behavior that doesn't need to
 > > be supported.
 > 
 > of course it's not nice. But we're talking about existing code calling the
 > legacy quotactl. If we're going to change it to not check the fstab
 > options any more, we may as well change it to use libquota.

I don't understand - surely edquota and repquota go through your
proplib interface now?

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index