Re: SCRIPTS v FILES

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: SCRIPTS v FILES
From: markucz%gmail.com@localhost
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:46:12 +0300

> -FILES=         c89.sh
> -FILESNAME=     c89
> -FILESDIR=      /usr/bin
> -FILESMODE=     ${BINMODE}
> +SCRIPTS=       c89.sh
> +SCRIPTSDIR=    /usr/bin
  
> -FILES=         c99.sh
> -FILESNAME=     c99
> -FILESDIR=      /usr/bin
> -FILESMODE=     ${BINMODE}
> +SCRIPTS=       c99.sh
> +SCRIPTSDIR=    /usr/bin

Would this result in having c[89]9.sh in /usr/bin? I think the names c89 and
c99 are more intuitive.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SCRIPTS v FILES
  - From: David Holland

References:
- SCRIPTS v FILES
  - From: Aleksej Saushev

Prev by Date: SCRIPTS v FILES
Next by Date: Re: SCRIPTS v FILES
Previous by Thread: SCRIPTS v FILES
Next by Thread: Re: SCRIPTS v FILES
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index