Re: Issues with FFS vs UFS name in applications and documentation

[der Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>]

>     The source code organisation in src/sys/ufs implies a common
>     code-base called "ufs", with more specific implimentations of
>     "ffs" (Berkeley Fast File System), "ext2fs" (Linux ext2), "lfs"
>     (Berkeley Log-structured File System), (etc.)

Isn't that at least roughly correct, for the kernel source level (which
is what the code in src/sys/ is)?  There's a moderate amount of code
that's shared there (the stuff in sys/ufs/ufs).

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML                mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B