Re: vi vs. nvi

[Lubomir Sedlacik <salo%Xtrmntr.org@localhost>]

On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 09:10:30PM +0900, SODA Noriyuki wrote:
> BTW, I don't know the result of recent Solaris.
> Could any try the following commands with the programs attached at the
> end of this mail?
>       $ env LANG=en_US ./strcoll a B
>       $ env LANG=en_US ./strcoll B z
>       $ echo 'B' | env LANG=en_US ./regex '[a-z]'
>       $ env LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./strcoll a B
>       $ env LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./strcoll B z
>       $ echo 'B' | env LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./regex '[a-z]'
> According to the source code (*3), it seems OpenSolaris doesn't use
> strcoll(3)/wcscoll(3), and always compares character code values,
> although I may be missing something.

Here goes:

OS                        LANG           CODESET(*1) result of regexec(3)
------------------------- -------------- ----------  --------------------
Solaris 7                 en_US          ISO8859-1   not match
Solaris 7                 en_US.UTF-8    UTF-8       match
Solaris 8                 en_US          ISO8859-1   not match
Solaris 8                 en_US.UTF-8    UTF-8       match
Solaris 9                 en_US          ISO8859-1   not match
Solaris 9                 en_US.UTF-8    UTF-8       match
Solaris 10 FCS            en_US          ISO8859-1   not match
Solaris 10 FCS            en_US.UTF-8    UTF-8       not match
Solaris 10 Update 6 (*)   en_US          ISO8859-1   match
Solaris 10 Update 6 (*)   en_US.UTF-8    UTF-8       match
Solaris Nevada b91        en_US          ISO8859-1   match
Solaris Nevada b91        en_US.UTF-8    UTF-8       match
OpenSolaris 2008.05 + b94 en_US          ISO8859-1   match
OpenSolaris 2008.05 + b94 en_US.UTF-8    UTF-8       match

(*) Not sure when exactly between FCS and U6 this changed.  I could
    track it down to a patch number later if you want to know.


regards,

-- 
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --