tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: small comment confusion in unistd.h

To: tech-userlevel%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: small comment confusion in unistd.h
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:48:33 +0000

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 06:03:07PM +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote:
 > Is it ok to shuffle the comments in unistd.h (from -current) a little so
 > all _POSIX_* constants have their comment line in front of it?
 > See the attached patch.

Why wouldn't it be? It's clearly wrong the way it is...

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- small comment confusion in unistd.h
  - From: Klaus Heinz

Prev by Date: small comment confusion in unistd.h
Next by Date: Re: vi vs. nvi
Previous by Thread: small comment confusion in unistd.h
Next by Thread: syslog(3) behaviour for syslog-protocol
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index