Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:51:08 +0100

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:30:12PM +0100, Anthony Mallet wrote:
> What is the correct type name? (from a POSIX p.o.v. I mean).

Neither. POSIX does not specify anything here.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
  - From: Anthony Mallet

References:
- rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: Anthony Mallet
- Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: David Holland
- Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: Anthony Mallet
- Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: David Holland
- Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: David Holland
- Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: Anthony Mallet
- Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: Hubert Feyrer
- cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
  - From: Anthony Mallet

Prev by Date: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
Next by Date: Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
Previous by Thread: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
Next by Thread: Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index