On Oct 29, 12:55am, yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: snprintf_ss (Re: CVS commit: src/include)

| > | anyway, i don't think trying to make stdio signal safe is a good idea.
| > 
| > Neither do I. I am just trying to make vsnprintf() signal safe, and it
| > has not proven easy.
| 
| i meant, i don't think trying to make vsnprintf signal safe is a good idea.
| because it makes futher development of it nightmare.
| 
| the functionality ssp needs is very limited and it's trivial to implement
| a dedicated signal safe logger for it, isn't it?

Yes, that is true. It could use a minimal logger.

christos