Hubert Feyrer wrote:

> The question that I'm wondering about is, what is our long term goal here:
> Do we want to offer people a shell that they can feel comfortable with
> from the start (ie. base), or do we want to keep a minimal one and tell
> people clearly that if they want more they should install the package?
> If we want a comfortable shell, should it be csh- or sh-flavoured?
> Should the (default) command line editing of a comfortable shell be vi-
> or emacs-flavoured?

FWIW, I liked the idea suggesting to replace our /bin/csh with tcsh.

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat