Subject: Re: test: ==: unexpected operator
To: Darrin B.Jewell <dbj@netbsd.org>
From: Juan RP <juan@xtrarom.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 09/23/2006 07:29:05
On 22 Sep 2006 21:41:28 -0700
"Darrin B.Jewell" <dbj@netbsd.org> wrote:

> Hubert Feyrer <hubertf@netbsd.org> writes:
> > Allow '==' as synonym to '=', just like our ksh and bash do.
> > This also affects the sh(1) builtin test command.
> 
> I saw this go by in my commit mail and almost flew out of my
> seat to ask you not to do this.  However, I then investigated
> and found the discussion on tech-userlevel.
> 
> I'd like to add my voice in opposition to this change, for the
> same portability and standards reasons other people brought up.
> 
> I'd also suggest that invoking "bikeshed" to silence opposition is not
> appropriate, and proceeding to commit a change in the middle of a
> bikeshed discussion is a delicate procedure at best.

Agreed, Hubert the discussion was not terminated and there are people
against it.

I'm one of the persons against this change, please back it out until
it's resolved.