--3cI6DWK3Xt33P8nt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:06:08AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
>=20
> bash/Linux allows "=3D=3D" as an alternative to "=3D" in their test(1) co=
mmand.
> I wonder if we want to save some trouble and just make our test(1)=20
> silently accept that too, instead of fixing all the broken scripts out=20
> there.
>=20
> It'd be an extension to POSIX, so I don't see much of a problem.
>=20
> Any thoughts?

I don't really see the point.  Scripts that do that in pkgsrc will have
to be fixed no matter what because there are platforms we cannot
bastardize the same way we can with NetBSD.  Changing this will just
make them harder to detect, because a lot of pkgsrc developers use
NetBSD to do pkgsrc work.

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"You could have made it, spitting out benchmarks
Owe it to yourself not to fail"
Amplifico, Spitting Out Benchmarks, Hometakes Vol. 2, 2005.

--3cI6DWK3Xt33P8nt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBRROJ3NgoQloHrPnoAQJCcwf8CLi0mOK0TZyVewMMlNCfSPjND8qHJW5t
z5VHhB8mRYnuLdwACl7s4/BifBbhzy49eMF3aXv71MubZYrqkwMm8yQQEhtz2Ur0
ihhY3IDm0wnfwLuDbB3Haj7uMDyzFlp0GfeYyUwfjndMJ5+f/UGp8HrY2ApqcJIQ
L85xqXWlrAU8Ca8lhSisrF0uKganndiFLjkWignxbJxBUgeS3p7JeKN0BelZr9xd
bP6HDHebBVrMy4ZdcM8Gm9fZo5bWXfJxyKElIogc9v0TK0SHPGR6KOnTXEv6HqY3
dChN6GjNU8TVCzaYh/yEPQ7q3qji217D/xCoxpWFL+YKlsYvLVYwkA==
=Ig5r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3cI6DWK3Xt33P8nt--