Subject: Re: ps -o field=HEADING,field2=HEADING2
To: None <tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
From: Alan Barrett <apb@cequrux.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 09/11/2006 19:08:07
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> I would like to know when we decided that SUSv2 is a "reasonable
> standard" to which we should try to conform.  Please do not bring our
> ps(1) into conformance by giving it System V option syntax...

Please save both those flame wars for another day.  My current proposal
is purely about making the -o and -O flags more useful.  The fact that
the more useful behaviour for the -o flag is also described in SUSv2 is
incidental.

--apb (Alan Barrett)