Subject: Re: Detecting statvfs without autoconf
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
From: Quentin Garnier <cube@cubidou.net>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/06/2006 17:10:06
--7knXg9dK90d7f3Md
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:55:56PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
[...]
> 3) Reading that, you see that the change was not present with 200030000
>    and went in with 200040000.
>=20
> Which is what I wrote in my original mail.

Except it is not convenient to test for that, as 2.1 is 201000000,
because of the number dance we did after 2.0 release.  (2.1 doesn't have
statvfs.)

That's why I think pkgsrc tests after 2.99.9, which was the first
re-numbered version.  That effectively means support for 2.0D to 2.0H
was dropped.

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want
to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea."
KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.

--7knXg9dK90d7f3Md
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQ76WXtgoQloHrPnoAQKLiwf/boZRc/Z2wkWd20ng88Cmq5yQ8OAEw6LR
hwUkMHE26rmPG0yRcJkRENonKMvgdcS0i0l9NtCnRPKppmXM42zf9aeK95YYZYFF
mhOGZfrlU9eRGyzGlKEIF+4ZccHJCQTfNW5WhrKWyefhe17oKcKKdg1e1p5usYsP
AVfp2MVlQNfk1rILFJI6GI5InJXYvL9BFZIoZg65KYgUmWAPMqwTtLjo75m9ID1C
7rwZhDQ506iyDIi7VXhMUVMwVtPv4tN92W9m7J9HEgvM/T+dfJWVAgvOzKBpp4PW
AEtHahCQPzzgPMPsnZouZD23p07NC1riCPqxjyKRrEEenhQEUZrw+w==
=I93e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7knXg9dK90d7f3Md--