Brian Ginsbach <ginsbach@NetBSD.org> writes:
> Hmm, in some ways jot does too much!  The command line syntax is
> different.  I think for this reason alone it is probably easier to
> have a different command.  Now, I suppose that seq could be a shell
> script wrapper around jot.  Some additional functionality would
> need to be added to jot; the equal width option.  Still this would
> be even less bug for bug compatible with other existing implementations
> of seq.  I wrote the current C version before I knew about jot.
>
> There are 3rd party tools/scripts that expect seq not jot.

What OSes include seq at the moment?

Perry