Subject: Re: moving etc/release from etc to base set
To: mouss <usebsd@free.fr>
From: The Grey Wolf <greywolf@starwolf.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 09/03/2004 18:21:43
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thus spake mouss ("m> ") sometime Tomorrow...

m> The Grey Wolf wrote:
m>   > Absolutely:
m> >
m> > 1.  Process of elimination:
m> >
m> > 	It is potentially necessary in single-user mode, and so does
m> > 	  not belong under /usr (please no diatribes about how / and
m> > 	  /usr and /var and your mother's creamed chipped beef on toast
m> > 	  should all be in one grand unified filesystem, because I
m> > 	  disagree and you will not change my mind about this).
m>
m> this I disagree with. not only the file isn't necessay in single-user,
m> it's just not necessary at all. the proof is simple: we did without it
m> up so far.

1.  Perhaps not "necessary", but "desirable".  My bad.


m> as per the fs, I won't go saying that the best thing with be no fs at
m> all. filesystems should be a hidden thing. I don't see why a user should
m> go to think about how many megs/gigs/blocks/... when all that is a
m> matter of tuning that should be reserved for a minority (if at all).

Poppycock noted and redirected to /dev/null.

"Don't dope down the system, educate the users."

m> agreed. there doesn't seem to be another logical place, unless we have a
m> tree revolution, in which case, I'd see new dirs and so on. but before
m> that, I'd like to se an fs independent tree. unfortunately, this
m> requires a lot of work (if feasible).

I would rather not see this at all, thanks; not in NetBSD.  Perhaps in
a new up-and-coming OS.

m> cheers,
m> mouss

				--*greywolf;
- --
If anyone requests a reason as to why Windows NT is inferior to UNIX,
refer them to the process scheduler, for starters.  Of course, users
don't care, and programmers try not to, even though they both should.
If that fails, reiterate that remote administration and control of a
node is a *good* thing, especially if network security is concerned.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBORisDOGizqAnVRERAri4AKCJJsfzw/XPspY1n6wIBaEO5cbuiwCfVxOl
3xRb79vudAafo5F/F91kEHA=
=H01Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----