> | So, I will change it, ok?
> 
> I guess; but it looks like ours is semantically more correct.

I am sorry, I missed this mail.  Should I revert the changes?

Or, I guess there is the way that I will leave the change,
and add the mention about the weirdness of the POSIX specification
to the BUGS section of iconv(3).

--
Takuya SHIOZAKI