On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:07, mouss wrote:
> Berndt Josef Wulf wrote:
> 
> > 
> > There are a lot of others missing too and unless size is a consideration I 
> > like to move that those missing documents are being pulled into the tree 
so 
> > they are available with upcoming releases.
> 
> my guess is that it's not a size problem, but a maintenance issue (since 
> nobody updates it, let's forget about it). in my humble opinion, this is 
> is a bad approach, as I'd prefer to have old docs than to have nothing.
 
I beg to disagree, especially in case of tutorials since it will help 
newcomers and seasoned users alike in becoming more proficient in its use and 
understanding of the unix environment and its utilities. IMHO, there is no 
harm done by including these documents.

> > The document, 00.contents, actually lists and referres to these pages in 
which 
> > case I consider it to be a bug or at best false advertising.... ;-)
> 
> agreed, this is a bug. Now, what is the best way to get around?
> 
>