--Bqc0IY4JZZt50bUr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org> wrote:

> So:  is it worth to ``use up'' an option for this behaviour (which might
> possibly be needed lateron for some other functionality), or should I
> just back out the original changes?
>=20
> Should ls(1) get the '-b' option?

Given the lack of feedback, here's what I'll do tomorrow if I don't hear
any objections:

(a) back out printescaped
(b) implement ls -b as described in the above email

-Jan

--=20
Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so.

--Bqc0IY4JZZt50bUr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE/Y0lpfFtkr68iakwRAgr8AKCs1ojjWrUKZlULUY8YBH7ZYxUTggCgjfWg
d4BKTJYHFyI8rjGlhCkJ8go=
=qCrH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Bqc0IY4JZZt50bUr--