Subject: Re: technical acronyms (misc/17559)
To: Julio Merino <jmmv@menta.net>
From: None <cgd@broadcom.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 04/09/2003 11:54:27
At Wed, 9 Apr 2003 20:53:54 +0200, Julio Merino wrote:
> Anyway I find the wtf utility useful.

There are many useful utilities not in the 'src' tree.

There are many useful utilities in pkgsrc.

My point is about wtf is: why create a _new_ utility of questionable
usefulness and questionable content, and put it in src?


(Personally, to be honest, I don't think the existing 'wtf' should be
shipped in a system that wants to describe itself as
"professional-quality.")



cgd