woods@weird.com (Greg A. Woods) writes:
> > Erm, I think SUSv2 was intended to be aligned with POSIX, so that any SUSv2
> > implementation will also be a POSIX implementation.  This is trivially true
> > of SUSv3 of course.
> 
> "aligned with" != "same as"

Since the Austin group work was approved, SUS is now identical to
POSIX. Literally.

(Yes, I know I should be smarter than to reply here, but...)

.pm