Subject: Re: is bootpd still relevant
To: Luke Mewburn <lukem@wasabisystems.com>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/10/2001 13:48:48
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:38:20PM +1100, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> hi
>=20
> given that we have shipped dhcpd for a release (or two), is it worth
> continuing to ship bootpd (and its associated programs)? we don't even
> provide startup scripts for bootpd.
>=20
> thoughts/comments?

Maybe smaller, when only bootp functionality is needed? I have no idea.



	-is

--=20
 * Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from
   smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of
   smart terminals.  -- obs@burnout.demon.co.uk (obscurity)

--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBOlxZTDCn4om+4LhpAQH/6Qf+KEqgUC3885/to285hwo6sUoN9S90c/Kw
B3tZ7MXcDjebjXBNDe0JXg5CwOuHBeIeiEoXcUPFKSBE8vyIL2l8q5mj4yrNfb4w
tuecIP/UKzW8icD9igPE7gFntrXnDzqFqBwe7Y8WHiOBniFg5hQ6EJDbmVW+s4F5
Kw6qIv5kSLh8AeWk1sUY0e0tNbeiSldkYO1r6UEY4pePlm8JH5zEPo9Xj8ZCaJhA
mVptFf4P3K5xyxSRzvY3tJHTmn8p/3egwVKWn2UI+LKOKh4X/nBKdf5WBRUf94aT
NHbKGl1T6lvp/BUGszfxw/nRnKWiZB8oADLfW87sj5PWqDN7qIzUTA==
=perJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--