>: If we're going to remote ANYTHING from basesrc, it probably ought to be
>: RCS -- CVS no longer requires it, and most people use CVS for version
>: controlling these days.
>
>I agree on RCS as well, and have proposed it before, meeting the response of
>"well, we don't have a pkgized base system, so buzz off."  However,
>technical arguments like these certainly weigh better.

there are probably lots of things that meet this description.  all the
games, for example.

fwiw, i use rcs all the time, and cvs almost never, hence, i am
opposed to the idea of removing rcs from basesrc.  when working in a
small group, rcs is fine.  removing both source code revision control
systems from basesrc would be bad.

i guess i wouldn't mind so much if someone wrote wrapper scripts for
cvs that emulated the rcs commands.  :)

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."