On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 08:41:02PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> 
> As discussed, the patch below does NOT enable or disable things, but add
> only a bunch or warnings. Is this ok so far? Are there any warnings in the
> wrong place? Are there more warnings necessary somewhere? 
> 
> I've decided to put the warnings near the daemons that'll be influenced by
> the absence of the one or other service, rather than putting all the
> warnings in one place. 

portmap is not needed for nfs_client (for example: you can mount a NFS server
from the install boot floppy :)

--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--