Re: C compiler (over-)optimization (was: netbsd-11 gcc bug)

[Andrew Cagney <andrew.cagney%gmail.com@localhost>]

> Maybe we go back to PCC and make sure it evolves to conform to a variant
> of C where there is no UB -- only IDB, i.e. as you said, the compiler
> explicitly defines semantics for everything that the C Lawyers call UB.

That runs the risk of compiler and language lock-in.

I'm more worried about things like this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125524