Re: RT linker, rpath and security

To: tech-toolchain%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: RT linker, rpath and security
From: Lloyd Parkes <lloyd%must-have-coffee.gen.nz@localhost>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 21:24:03 +1200



On 11/05/23 20:37, Martin Husemann wrote:

On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:22:08AM +0200, tlaronde%polynum.com@localhost wrote:

Would you mind specifying what "admin decisions" you are referring to?


Installing a binary with an untrusted RPATH or making some directories
writable that should not be.


I would include whoever wrote "the Makefile" as an admin decision maker.

I would report any RPATH problems to whoever wrote "the Makefile" as asecurity bug, after all that is the source of the problem. Maybe withsome advice on how to do it right could be added.


Cheers,
Lloyd

References:
- RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: tlaronde
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: tlaronde
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: Martin Husemann

Prev by Date: Re: RT linker, rpath and security
Next by Date: Re: RT linker, rpath and security
Previous by Thread: Re: RT linker, rpath and security
Next by Thread: Re: [and paxctl] RT linker, rpath and security
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index