On 23.10.2019 20:14, Christos Zoulas wrote: > In article <848a074a-bea1-1ebe-705e-74c20294d95a%gmx.com@localhost>, > Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> wrote: >> -=-=-=-=-=- >> -=-=-=-=-=- >> >> On 23.10.2019 19:28, Robert Swindells wrote: >>> >>> There is a restriction in our ld.elf_so that it can only load two >>> segments. >>> >> >> Please test the patch from: >> >> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-toolchain/2019/01/06/msg003368.html >> >> I plan to land it into src/ in 2 weeks unless a better version will be >> available. > > I think that it is a lot more palatable to use the FreeBSD approach > rather than handle 1 more segment this way. At least this way we'll > have the code relatively in sync. > > christos > I have no opinion either way, as long as it will work with modern linkers I am fine with it. There was promised a more proper approach but nothing was unveiled until today.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature