Re: ctype(3), again

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 03:44:32PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Is there something we can improve in the NetBSD headers so that clang
> doesn't behave more pickily and gcc in this case?

Uhmmm, this may not be what you'd like to hear, but: gcc *not* warning in
this case is a bug, isn't it? This used to work - what broke it (or why
isn't it doing it in this concrete case)?

Martin