tech-toolchain archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Memory alignment not respected in thread-local objects

To: NetBSD Toolchain and Build Technical Discussion List <tech-toolchain%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Memory alignment not respected in thread-local objects
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 23:15:49 +0100

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:21:30PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> How about forcing a larger default alignment?  64 bytes would be
> sufficient for our compiler-rt, and I don't think we need to be sparing
> with the address space here.

The only case I find in compiler-rt is a pure performance hack of
questionable validity. Seems entirely optional.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Memory alignment not respected in thread-local objects
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski

References:
- Memory alignment not respected in thread-local objects
  - From: Michał Górny
- Re: Memory alignment not respected in thread-local objects
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Memory alignment not respected in thread-local objects
  - From: Michał Górny

Prev by Date: Re: Memory alignment not respected in thread-local objects
Next by Date: Re: Memory alignment not respected in thread-local objects
Previous by Thread: Re: Memory alignment not respected in thread-local objects
Next by Thread: Re: Memory alignment not respected in thread-local objects
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index