On Feb 9, 12:52pm, abs%netbsd.org@localhost (David Brownlee) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: ansi.h include guards
| Erk... Is there a sane _ANSI_ _MACHINE_ANSI_ _MACHINE_ARCH_ANSI_
| pattern somewhere or is that trying to force it...
So for machines that don't have three levels, which one do you choose
for the second level, _MACHINE_ANSI_? Also changing this would cause
churn. And it is not only ansi.h that needs changing. I'd rather change
things in the direction of the majority...